Thursday, December 4, 2008

At last, someone with the testicular fortitude

Finally, a politician with the guts and the watak keperwiraan – the testicular fortitude – to address head-on and stand his ground on the issue of vernacular schools, the throbbing cancerous tumour that has been the single biggest obstacle to Malaysia’s social cohesion and the main impediment to the creation of a Bangsa Malaysia speaking in one voice, Bahasa Malaysia, guided by the budaya and tatatertib of the Orang Melayu.

Kudos to Mukhriz Mahathir!

This vernacular school menace must be expeditiously and decisively obliterated from our Tanah Air Tercinta. A society that allows, indeed sanctions, such a prickly, divisive ethno-sociological anomaly – after over a half century of Merdeka – does not deserve the privilege of nationhood. If we think we are a people worthy of our own Negara Merdeka under the Panji-Panji Raja-Raja Melayu Berdaulat, we must then take swift and decisive action to annihilate this societal outrage that has become a clear threat to our socio-political stability, to the development of a cohesive Bangsa Malaysia and, indeed, to our national security and integrity of Bumi Malaysia.

The Malaysian nation cannot support a system that produces functional illiterates molded in the linguistic and cultural forms of alien nations far from the shores of our Tanah Air. Many of these SRJK lost souls drop out upon entering the national high school system due to their sheer inability to adapt to the mainstream Bahasa Malaysia-centric curriculum. Many will become lifelong socio-economic burdens as these social outcasts ultimately percolate into the underground economy to eke out a wretched existence on the fringes of criminality. They also add to the social roadblock towards effective nation-building and in the formation of a cohesive, productive Anak Bangsa Malaysia.

The SRJK(C) and (T) produce kids who are more insular, more parochial and less receptive to socio-cultural diversity. From my own direct interaction with these products of vernacular schooling, I find them not only below par in Bahasa Malaysia BUT also grossly deficient in English as well. Hence, they are handicapped in the national language and the international language of commerce – a double whammy the vast majority will never be able to overcome.

These functional illiterates end up as a cheap source of semi-indentured labour in the motor workshops, auto accessory shops, in the building trades, sleazy unisex salons, become cetak rompak aficionados, stalk shopping malls to harass shoppers with a myriad of worthless gizmos and, in the case of many if not most Tamil-educated Indians, become low wage general workers, lorry drivers and assorted hired hands for the towkays.

The anti-Malay chauvinist politicians will then turn around and blame the NEP and Ketuanan Melayu for this socio-economic malady of their own concoction, further unraveling the last vestiges of social cohesion we may have in our
Tanah Air Tercinta.

I often wonder, where is this vast trove of “superior” products of the Chinese and Tamil schools? Where are these people who purportedly benefit from superior education compared to the government schools?

Where?


Rakyat Malaysia yang cintakan Negara dan yang mahu membina sebuah Bangsa Malaysia yang Seia, Sehati dan Sejiwa harus berganding bahu dan mengembeling tenaga untuk membanteras sehabisan-habisan gejala sekolah vernakular yang telah menjadi sarang dan punca berbagai masalah sosial Tanah Air tercinta kita. Inilah langkah pertama dalam perjuangan kita untuk membentuk sebuah Bangsa Malaysia yang berbahasa Malaysia dan berpandu kepada budaya dan tatatertib Melayu di Bumi Malaysia tercinta ini.

Satu Bangsa, Satu Bahasa, Satu Negara bukan lah laungan retorik semata-mata. Inilah teras pertiwi dan teraju segala falsafah yang akan menjamin kedaulatan, ketahanan dan keutuhan Negara Malaysia tercinta dalam menghadapi berbagai cabaran sosio-ekonomi dan politik dalaman dan luaran yang kian semakin rancak bergelora.



Hasil Sekolah Vernakular

After 51 years of Merdeka?
A banner protesting Ahmad Ismail’s “Cina Pendatang” remark written in …… Mandarin …… the national language of the People’s Republic of China, an alien foreign language (even to ethnic-Chinese Malaysians) that led Ahmad Ismail to view them as “Pendatangs” in the first place.




The inherently contradictory and indefensibly dichotomous position of the Chinese chauvinists in their defense of vernacular schooling 51 years after Merdeka are endless. There exist no single logical argument that supports the continuation of the archaic colonial-era Chinese and Tamil school streams in a sovereign nation such as Malaysia, where Bahasa Malaysia is the sole national language and constitutionally supreme over any other language or dialect. Indeed, no other language is mentioned by name in the Malaysian Federal Constitution.

Anything that threatens the constitutional supremacy of Bahasa Malaysia – and vernacular schools are the most blatant example – must be vigorously curtailed and abolished. The greater public good – in this case, a single unifying language for the Federation – by definition must prevail over ancillary cultural rights of assorted sub-groups and descendants of the immigrant races, collectively defined as “other communities” in Article 153 of the Federal Constitution.

“Malay” is mentioned 54 times in the Federal Constitution. “Natives of any of the States of Sabah and Sarawak” are also mentioned many times, often in tandem with “Malay.” There exists no specific reference to a “Chinese” or “Indian” or “Punjabi” or “Eurasian” or any other ethnic group. These non-Malays and non-Borneo natives are lumped as “other communities,” the residual populace of the Federation. Hence, Article 153, by design and implication, specifically differentiates the “Malays” and the “Natives of any of the States of Sabah and Sarawak” from the “other communities.”

Article 153 of the Federal Constitution in the same breath mentions the "legitimate interests" of the "other communities."

"Legitimate” is the key word when we talk about the “legitimate interests” of the “other communities.” Indeed, the “legitimate” in the “legitimate interests” of the “other communities” are subordinate to the larger national interests of the Federation. In terms of National Language policy, the “legitimate interests” of the "other communities" must necessarily be subordinated to the supremacy of Bahasa Malaysia (a larger national interest) and these "legitimate interests" should never be an impediment to the development and propagation of the National Language among the citizens of the Federation.

Vernacular schools are clearly impediments to the development and propagation of our National Language among our citizens. Hence, their very constitutionality can be reviewed and debated in the context of propagating the larger national interest and social integrity of the Federation of Malaysia.

In a nutshell, the qualifying term “legitimate” in the "legitimate interests" of the "other communities" implies the non-absolute nature of the “interests” of Malaysia’s “other communities.” In terms of language and cultural "rights" of the non-Malays and non-Borneo natives of the Federation, the determination of what is "legitimate" in the "legitimate interests" of these "other communities" must be conducted against the backdrop of a larger, all pervasive national interest and public good for the Federation. The Federal Constitution hence clearly implies that the "right" of the non-Malay, non-Borneo native populace is non-absolute and subordinated to the rights of the general populace and to the public good. "Mother tongue" language usage and vernacular schooling are no exceptions.

I must reiterate that the "Malays" and the "Natives of any of the States of Sabah and Sarawak" are constitutionally distinct from the "other communities." Sorry, we are not the same under the Malaysian Federal Constitution. This was how the Federation of Malaysia was forged amidst the polygot of former Malay States under British protection, British colonies and settlements. To question the distinct status of the "Malays" and the "Natives of any of the States of Sabah and Sarawak" is tantamount to a repudiation of the fundamental tenets of the nation of Malaysia itself. In other words, treasonous.

Hence, for contemporary opportunistic anti-Malay politicians to cast the “Malay” and other “Natives” in the same light as the so-called “other communities” and then to demand kesamarataan among these two groups – including a parallel National vs. Vernacular school system – are not only unconstitutional, but also seditious, delusional, mischievous and self-destructive and, indeed, a pathetic indication of their utter ignorance of the socio-demographic blueprint of the Malaysian Federal Constitution that was forged in the context of Malay compromises and giveaways to the desperate, stateless pendatangs and their descendants.

Mukhriz Mahathir is absolutely correct and Demi Negara lauds his position.

At a time where "Malay Rights" and every single instrument of Malaysian nationhood are being brought into disrepute by the anti-Malay reactionary forces currently infesting and contaminating our Tanah Air, it is time for all patriotic Anak-Anak Bangsa Malaysia to rise and question the many social anomalies and maladies propagated by these same treasonous reactionary forces that have effectively short-circuited our nation building process. Vernacular schooling is the most prominent of these social ailments.

Lets discuss. I want to hear intelligent arguments. State your case logically and share your thoughts and experiences.

210 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 210 of 210
Ladyhawke said...

Hi KijangMas,

Where have you been? Please write something. It's been too longggg! The wait is unbearable! Aaaaarrrgggghhhh!


Your first ever commenter

Saya... said...

bang,

tumpang lalu:

Tehsin asks you to sign the Petition to ICC to Investigate War Crimes by Israel in GAZA here: http://malaysiantigress.blogspot.com.

satD said...

can i be 202 then

Anonymous said...

I need my DN fix ....... NOW!!!

Getting withdrawal symptoms.

Lets build this "petition" till KijangMas reappears. This is numero 205.


Vorennisch

Anonymous said...

Count me in. Kijangmas, where are you?

What's my number again?

Anonymous said...

KijangMas,

I come to this posting 2 months late. I'm the new kid on the block .. blog.

I agree with your views (and may give my own later). For now, allow me to repeat the problems with vernacular school kids in your own words, in case others forget, now over 200 comments and 2 months on:

- problem in adapting
- less receptive to socio-cultural
diversity
- below par in BM and deficient in
English as well
- chauvinist politicians blame NEP
and Ketuanan Melayu for this
socio-economic malady
- no single logical argument that
supports the continuation of ...
vernacular schools
- the "legitimate interests of the
other communities" must be
subordinated to Bahasa Malaysia
(a larger national interest)

That this posting draws over 200 comments and the one on Bangsa Malaysia over 260 comments shows the interest people have on these
subjects. You have written them very well.

Attention other commenters (though no such word in the dictionary) -

I implore on all of us to not just urge KijangMas to keep writing, but also contribute comments from time to time ourselves. Hopefully pertinently always.

And not accusingly, derisively or incriminatingly because it reflects on you and may be self-incriminating. We don't see or know one other but think about it before you go to sleep once in a while.

Speak up by all means but respect the laws, both civil and social. Social laws are not written but are universal and are the ingredients of Bangsa Malaysia as well.

I don't mean to preach, although I have eaten a lot of salt, observe the development of other/ foreign civilisations when living with them
in one or two places, read quite a bit, and I think I have earned the right to "lecture" a little.

I think accepting the concept of Bangsa Malaysia (indeed the B must be capitalised), Bahasa Malaysia and the arguments against vernacular schools depends on acceptance of the facts of history of the country, the Social Contract entered into by our forefathers at Merdeka time, and most importantly, respect for the Constitution which has been discussed, agreed to and made into law a long time ago.

People can disagree and dissent but once it is decided by the majority in Parliament, you simply have to respect it and conform. Even in communist China and Soviet Russia they always get the People's Assembly discuss and agree to what the leaders propose, although it used to be a rubber stamp procedure.

We are a democracy for goodness sake. Respect the Constitution, stand up when the national anthem is played and don't ever try to make fun of it in musical videos etc ever again.

I would like to say more in due course. Meanwhile

Best wishes.

Anonymous said...

KijangMas,

Addendum to my earlier comment:

Fellow commenters,

Even just saying you agree or disagree helps.

Best wishes.

Anonymous said...

Kijangmas,

This is meant for Ngnglee, who has not appeared on the screen for 2 months. Even if doesn't come back, others who think like him may read this.

He said "strong culture will dominate the weaker ones" -

Is he and the likes of him echoing the sentiments of the fellow who once said the Malays have no culture soon after getting so-called kicked out of Malaysia,
had our boys' hair cut short before entering the newly acquired island and did what zazaland, satD and others said they did to the Malays in Singapore?

His statement sounds mischievous.

Does he know what the definition of culture is? The sociologists, anthropologists etc have a total of over 130 definitions of culture. Which one(s)do they want to go by?

One universally accepted definition of culture is "the sum total of the experiences of a community".

Does he know what Chinese culture actually is? Has he read Professor C.P Fitzgerald's book, A Short Cultural History of China ("short" but 600+ pages)and determined what aspects of Chinese culture his forefathers brought to the then Malaya?

When you read the history of Perak and Selangor during the British colonial period and the history of the early Chinese, it is full of clan warfare, secret societies and gangsterism. Ghee Hin, Hai San, Ho Hap Siah, were examples. These went on for a long time; secret socities and gangsterism last to this very day. These are also a part of "the sum total of the experiences" of the Chinese community. Are these also part of Ngnglee's idea of a strong culture that "would dominate the weaker culture"?

Don't think along these lines lah, people. I am not belittling other aspects of your culture but have respect for the Malay culture.

You need to understand, and appreciate the facts of history of the country, the Social Contract, the Constitution that have been agreed by our forefathers at Merdeka time. If you appreciate that the Malays have been here as an organised community, with a functioning system of government, earlier than anybody else (the aborigines did not have a government), that the British, and even the Chinese in early Penang mining tin in Perak recognised and dealt with the Malay rulers, you s should have regard for and respect the Malay culture.

I hope to help put out other salient facts of history of the country, explain the Social Contract and the relevant parts of the Constitution as we go along. Hopefully Ngnglee and like-minded Malaysians would understand and appreciate them.

Best wishes.

Anonymous said...

I think Theodore Roosevelt's speech might apply to Malaysians of the same ilk:
"There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all... The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, English-Americans, French-Americans, Scandinavian-Americans or Italian-Americans, each preserving its separate nationality, each at heart feeling more sympathy with Europeans of that nationality, than with the other citizens of the American Republic... There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American. The only man who is a good American is the man who is an American and nothing else."

Ikan Buntal said...

Saya telahpun meluangkan masa yang agak lama membaca olahan-olahan dan huraian fakta oleh Kijang Mas dan ulasan-ulasan balas yang dikemukan oelh para pembaca,terutama yang lebih condong kearah pemikiran yang berpaksikan Malaysian Malaysia,berdasarkan acuan dan ramuan otak Lim Kit Siang.Berikut adalah ulasan saya:-

1."Orang Cina tidak boleh diberikan kebebasan sebebas-bebasnya,jika tidak keadaan kelam kabut boleh terjadi seperti di Taiwan", ulasan ini bukan keluar dari mulut orang Melayu tapi dari mulut orang Cina yang amat berjaya dan maha terkenal --> Jackie Chan.Maka para rakyat Cina sedarlah,di Malaysia anda begitu bongkak menuntut yang pada hemahnya keterlaluan, sedangkan di negara asal anda,idol yang anda banggakan pun tidak begitu yakin akan kebebasan mutlak untuk anda.Perlukah di Malaysia muncul gerakan seperti yang dilaksanakan oleh Luang Phibul Songkram atau Sukarno,atau anda sebenarnya memang hendak satu Revolusi Budaya seperti yang orang Cina juga pelopori - Mao Ze Dong dilaksanakan oleh orang Melayu??

2.Di peringkat sekolah,penekanan pendidikan adalah wajib/mesti berbahsa Melayu/Malaysia.Tetapi setelah melangkah ke alam pekerjaan lain pulak ceritanya:-
a).Pergilah ke temuduga kerja di sektor swasta,jika anda berbangsa Melayu, si interviewer pasti akan menekan bahawa " In this organisation, we communicate in English", itulah pengalaman saya. Pergi ke sebuah syarikat yang dimiliki anak Melayu, CEO Melayu, bos Sumber Manusia Melayu, tapi wajibgak kecek bahso penjajah??

b)Kenapa?? Kita tengok mendalam lagi..Owner->Melayu,CEO --> Melayu, yang lain senior management 20% Melayu,70% Cina,baki baangsa2 lain, pegawai dan kerani,65% Melayu,30 % Cina dan baki bangsa2 lain. Faktor inikah??

c) Masuk meeting, tengoklak sapa yang masuk meeting, kalau pangkat paling besar yang masuk tu orang Cina,pegawai sekadar 40% Melayu dan bangsa2 lain,bakinya Cina gak, mesyuarat itu pasti bermula ngan English, kemudian sesam pengurusan dan pegawai yang berbangsa Cina semua pakat cakap kantonis,hokkien.Alasan??? Supaya Melayu yang masuk meeting ni jadi pak/mak tunggul...

d)Buat laporan nak hantar ke Bank Negara,ingatkan dalam bahasa Melayu, rupanya English belako.So, pasal Bank Negara nak laporan dalam Englishlah yang wajib staff kena pandai cakap Inggeris,ohh macam tu rupanya...

e) Dapat surat dari Bank Negara, kepala surat Bahasa Melayu, ucap Selamat bahasa Melayu, dah tu isi kandungan semua nya Bahasa Inggeris..kalau cam tu, regulator pun tak champion nak juangkan bahasa Malaysia/Bahasa Melayu/Bahasa Kebangsaan, maka hancurle..kalau sekadar nak di globalkan, laporan pada pihak berkuasa di Peranchis,Arab Saudi, PR China dan Jepun pun masih wajib bahasa kebangsaan, dah tu pakai ler apa progrm canggih translate, boleh pun...

f) Perasan atau tidak ayat seperti berikut biasa kita jumpa pada kontrak/perjanjian ," Sekiranya ada sebarang keraguan,versi Bahasa Inggeris akan terpakai mengatasi Bahasa Malaysia bagi tujuan maksud kontrak/perjanjian "..boleh benda2 macam ni..depan hidung regulator pun selambo ajer....


g) Bank Negara Malaysia ATAU Bank Negara Inggeris??Kenapa identiti komunikasinya masih terjajah..

Komen Ikhlas dari "Ikan Buntal"

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 210 of 210   Newer› Newest»